📘 심화영어독해 작년 분석 & 2026 예상문제

1학기 중간고사 대비 HAFS · 국제과정 2학년 정연 · 이소라(Sora) + David Mandell(Mr. B)

① 시험 개요 — 2025학년도 1학기 2차 지필평가

실시일자
2025년 7월 3일(목) — 1교시
학년 / 과정
2학년 국제과정(국제트랙) · 1A, 1B반 대상
교과목
영어 작문과 토론 (심화영어독해 겸칭)
출제 교사
이소라(Sora) · David Blaisdell(Mr. B)
배점 구조
선택형 60점 + 서답형(FRQ) 40점 = 100점
문항 수
선택형 20문항(1~20번) · FRQ 2문항 · 총 30점 분량
시험지 분량
3장 (A4 양면 기준)
주의: OCR 텍스트는 시험지 스캔본(exam1~3.txt)과 채점기준(answer1~2.txt)에서 추출했으며, 2025 시험지의 객관식 문항은 총 20문항(문제당 평균 2.8~3.2점)이며, 본 문서에서 "30문항 구성"으로 언급된 부분은 선택형 20 + FRQ 2 (각 20점) 구조를 의미한다. OCR로 인해 일부 선택지 텍스트에 잡음이 있어 "OCR 품질 주의" 표기한 항목은 원문 대조 필요.

📊 선택형 배점 분포

  • 4점 × 3문항 (Q1, Q3, Q8)
  • 3.2점 × 3문항 (Q15, Q16, Q20)
  • 3점 × 8문항
  • 2.8점 × 3문항 (Q12, Q17, Q18)
  • 2점 × 3문항 (Q2, Q5, Q6)
  • 합계 60점

✍️ 서답형(FRQ)

  • FRQ 1: 문학 분석(20점)
  • FRQ 2: Affluenza 분석(20점)
  • 최소 7~9문장 / 영어 작문

🧭 난이도 경향

  • 중상~상 비중 약 70%
  • "BEST explains" 추론 다수
  • 인용/수사분석 강조

② 작년 시험 지문 구성

2025 시험은 한 지문당 1~2문항 단위로 짧게 나눠, 수업에서 다뤘던 작품·에세이·시·논픽션 전반을 종합 테스트하는 방식이었다. 즉 '한 지문 심층분석' 보다 '여러 텍스트를 얇고 넓게 묻는' 스타일.

#지문 / 텍스트장르출제자해당 문항
1Far from the Tree — Andrew Solomon논픽션 에세이DavidQ1, Q9
2Bonnie Raitt — Just Like That (song lyrics + interview)가사/인터뷰DavidQ2
3George Saunders — Sticks (flash fiction)단편소설DavidQ3
4Romantic Poetry (Tyger, Ozymandias, Maldive Shark, Learned Astronomer, This Is Just to Say)시 — Sublime 모티프DavidQ4 (NOT 유형)
5David Kaczynski interview (Gary Wright / Ted Kaczynski)기사·인터뷰DavidQ5, Q6
6Ezra Klein — NPC column논평 칼럼DavidQ7
7Graeber & Wengrow — The Dawn of Everything (Kandiaronk)역사·인류학DavidQ8
8Robert Hayden — Those Winter SundaysDavidQ10, FRQ1
9The Sunk Cost Bias (교재)비문학 심리SoraQ11
10The History of the Chicken (교재)비문학 문화사SoraQ12
11The Sistine Chapel Ceiling (교재)비문학 예술사SoraQ13, Q14
12The Relativity Trap (교재)비문학 심리SoraQ15, Q16
13IDIOTS / 디지털 행동 (교재 관련)비문학 사회SoraQ17
14Euphemisms (교재)비문학 언어SoraQ18
15Method Acting (교재)비문학 연기/문법SoraQ19, Q20 (문법)
16Affluenza (교재)비문학 사회SoraFRQ2
핵심 관찰:
  • David 파트(Q1~Q10) — 문학·시·칼럼·인터뷰가 주된 재료. 수사분석/테마 해석이 중심.
  • Sora 파트(Q11~Q20) — 교재 지문 기반으로 요지·추론·문법(분사구문)을 묻는 구조.
  • FRQ 두 개 모두 "특정 작품 + 수사기법 분석" 또는 "사회 개념 + 예시 + 해결책" 유형.

③ 문제 유형 분류표

선택형 (Q1~Q20 · 60점)

유형문항빈도난이도비고
"BEST explains/captures" 추론Q1, Q2, Q5, Q9, Q11, Q16★★★★★선지가 길고 비슷해 헷갈리기 쉬움
주제/메시지 요약Q6, Q8, Q12, Q17, Q18★★★★중상"primary rhetorical purpose" 계열
NOT 유형 (역선택)Q4★★★Sublime 예시로 NOT 해당하는 것
세부 정보 일치 (CORRECT)Q13, Q14, Q15, Q19★★★★지문 내 단서 직접 확인
인물/상징 해석Q3, Q5★★★Sticks 아버지, Gary Wright 은유
수사 효과/반복 기능Q10★★★중상"What did I know" 반복 기능
문법 — 분사구문 오류 식별Q20★★Method Acting 지문 기반
인용 의도 파악Q7, Q9★★★중상Klein NPC, Stevens epigraph

서답형 / FRQ (40점)

문항유형배점요구사항
FRQ 1 문학 2작품 비교 분석20점 ① 두 작품 선택 → ② 구체적 구절/장면 제시 → ③ 주제 연결 → ④ 수사/문체 기법 분석
FRQ 2 Affluenza 단락 작성20점 ① 정의 → ② 부유/비부유 영향 비교 → ③ 지문 예시 2개 → ④ 현실적 해결책 → 7~9 문장 이상

배점 분포 (선택형) — 실제 답지 기준

배점문항 수해당 문항
4점3Q1, Q3, Q8
3.2점3Q15, Q16, Q20
3점8Q4, Q7, Q9, Q10, Q11, Q13, Q14, Q19
2.8점3Q12, Q17, Q18
2점3Q2, Q5, Q6

④ 20문항 + 2 FRQ — 실제 문제 & 정답 & 풀이

표기 안내
  • 지문/선지는 OCR 원문을 의미 보존 수준으로 정리했다(인쇄 오류·스캔 잡음 제거). 학생 본인의 시험지이므로 공정이용 범위 내 인용.
  • 정답은 채점기준표(answer1.txt)에 따름. 답지 스캔이 흐릿한 경우 "OCR 재확인 필요" 표시.
Q1 Solomon Far from the Tree — 사회·의료 진보의 역설 선택형David

Question: According to Solomon in Far from the Tree, what paradox comes from both social and medical progress happening at the same time?

  • ① Society is more accepting of nontraditional families, but people are becoming more isolated.
  • As society gets more accepting, we also have more ways to fix differences through medicine.
  • ③ Medical advances have made it harder for some people to get treatments for disabilities.
  • ④ Social progress has fallen behind advancements in genetic engineering and prenatal screening.
  • ⑤ Families with disabled children need more help from the community than before.
정답: ② / 배점 4점

Solomon은 서문에서 "사회적 수용성""의학적 교정 수단"이 동시에 증가한다는 역설을 지적한다. 즉 '차이를 받아들이자'는 담론과 '차이를 없앨 수 있다'는 기술이 공존. 선지 ②가 이 모순을 정확히 포착.

Q2 Bonnie Raitt Just Like That — 내러티브 구축 선택형David

Excerpt:

"Excuse me, ma'am, maybe you can help The directions weren't so clear I'm looking for Olivia Zand They said I might find her here"

Q: Which of the following BEST explains how this passage contributes to the song's overall message?

  • The detailed narrative establishes a realistic setting that invites listeners into an intimate, emotional encounter, highlighting themes of grief and redemption.
  • ② The direct dialogue creates tension by portraying confusion and conflict between characters, emphasizing the chaotic nature of loss.
  • ③ The vague description of place and people makes the story universal and abstract, distancing the listener from specific emotions.
  • ④ The use of passive voice and indirect speech conveys the narrator's detachment and inability to face the past.
  • ⑤ The lighthearted tone and casual phrasing suggest a sarcastic commentary on the randomness of fate.
정답: ① / 배점 2점

Raitt는 장기 기증자의 어머니가 기증받은 청년을 찾아가는 이야기를 실제적이고 구체적인 장면으로 구축한다. 정답 ①은 "현실적 setting → 친밀한 감정 만남 → 애도와 구원의 테마"로 이어지는 Raitt의 storytelling 방식을 정확히 요약.

Q3 Saunders Sticks — 아버지의 감정적 여정 선택형David

Q: What does the father's changing use of the metal pole show about his emotional journey over time in Sticks?

  • ① He tries to keep holiday traditions alive and bring happiness to his kids with humor and creativity.
  • ② The family doesn't have much money, and the father tries to make the best of it.
  • He changes from being emotionally closed off to trying to connect, apologize, and express himself.
  • ④ His increasing reliance on the pole shows a desire to live in an imaginary world.
  • ⑤ He wants to control how his kids remember their childhood.
정답: ③ / 배점 4점

Saunders의 Sticks에서 아버지는 처음엔 명절 장식으로만 쓰던 금속 기둥을 후반에 이르러 용서/사죄/자기고백의 매개체로 사용한다. "LOVE, FORGIVE" 같은 쪽지를 매다는 장면이 핵심. 감정적으로 닫혀 있던 인물이 뒤늦게 연결을 시도하는 여정을 요약한 ③이 정답.

Q4 Sublime 예시 식별 (NOT) 선택형David

Q: Identify which one does NOT exemplify the sublime, and explain why by referencing a specific item from the poem.

  • ① "The Tyger" — emphasizing fearsome, mysterious power.
  • ② "Ozymandias" — a ruined statue in the desert symbolizing the decay of once-mighty power.
  • ③ "The Maldive Shark" — illustrating the deep one and grand natural imagery evoking fear and fascination.
  • ④ "Learned Astronomer" — The narrator's excitement at the vastness of the universe and stars, evoking wonder and awe.
  • "This Is Just to Say" by William Carlos Williams — a brief, casual apology for eating someone else's plums.
정답: ⑤ / 배점 3점

Sublime(숭고)은 "압도적·경외·공포·무한"의 정서를 말한다. Williams의 This Is Just to Say는 일상적·사소한 사죄(자두를 먹어서 미안해)로, 의도적으로 반(反)Sublime — 즉 숭고함의 반대극. 나머지 4개 모두 숭고의 고전 예시이므로 ⑤가 정답(역선택).

Q5 Gary Wright — 상징적 foil / 주제 선택형David

Q: How does Gary Wright's role serve as a foil or source of irony in contrast to David's relationship with his biological brother, Ted Kaczynski, and what larger theme does this relationship highlight?

  • ① Gary Wright symbolizes the failed relationship David had with Ted, emphasizing the theme of familial betrayal.
  • Gary Wright represents the possibility of spiritual connection despite broken blood ties, highlighting themes of chosen family and healing.
  • ③ Gary Wright contrasts with Ted by encouraging violence to advance social change, underscoring the theme of justified rebellion.
  • ④ Gary Wright serves as a reminder of Ted's intellectual legacy, emphasizing the theme of technological progress.
  • ⑤ Gary Wright's presence illustrates the futility of forgiveness, reinforcing the theme of inevitable family conflict.
정답: ② / 배점 2점

David는 피붙이 Ted와는 단절되었지만 Gary Wright(Ted의 폭탄 테러 생존자)를 "brother in spirit"이라 부른다. 혈연이 끊어진 자리에 영적 형제애가 들어서는 이 아이러니는 chosen family(선택한 가족)치유라는 주제를 부각. ②가 정답.

Q6 David Kaczynski 최종 인용의 수사적 목적 선택형David

Q: What is the PRIMARY rhetorical purpose of the final quote in which he reflects on his brother Ted's prescient ideas and violent actions?

  • ① To excuse Ted's crimes by contextualizing them within larger societal frustrations.
  • ② To defend Ted's anti-technology views as visionary and widely accepted today.
  • To caution against conflating legitimate critique with acts of violence.
  • ④ To expose the hypocrisy of a society that ignored Ted's warnings until it was too late.
  • ⑤ To express hope that Ted's intellectual legacy will be redeemed over time.
정답: ③ / 배점 2점

David는 "형의 통찰은 훌륭했으나 폭력으로 오염되었다"고 말한다. 즉 정당한 비판(legitimate critique)과 폭력적 행동(acts of violence)을 혼동하지 말라는 경계의 메시지. 이를 정확히 포착한 ③이 정답.

Q7 Ezra Klein — NPC 용어의 우파 수용 이유 선택형David

Q: According to Ezra Klein's NPC passage, why did the political right embrace the term "NPC" to describe liberals?

  • ① To argue that liberals were skilled at playing video games.
  • ② To show that liberals were open to difficult and controversial conversations.
  • ③ To praise liberals for their loyalty to institutions.
  • ④ To explain how liberals created popular internet memes.
  • To suggest that liberals acted without independent thought and simply followed group norms.
정답: ⑤ / 배점 3점

NPC = Non-Playable Character(게임에서 대사만 반복하는 무개성 캐릭터). 우파는 진보가 독립적 사고 없이 집단 규범만 따른다고 조롱하는 용도로 차용. ⑤가 정답.

Q8 Kandiaronk — 사유재산·법체계 비판의 핵심 선택형David

Q: Based on The Dawn of Everything, which BEST summarizes Kandiaronk's main concern about systems like private property and codified laws?

  • ① They inspire innovation but require strict obedience to authority.
  • They promote inequality by encouraging greed and undermining communal values.
  • ③ They create advanced civilizations at the cost of individual identity.
  • ④ They encourage healthy competition but result in social tension.
  • ⑤ They prevent people from experiencing the spiritual fulfillment of nature.
정답: ② / 배점 4점

Wendat의 지도자 Kandiaronk는 17세기 프랑스 제도에 대해 "사유재산·법률이 탐욕을 부추기고 공동체 가치를 무너뜨려 불평등을 만든다"고 비판. ②가 정답.

Q9 Wallace Stevens epigraph — Solomon의 주제 반영 선택형David

"The imperfect is our paradise — Lies in flawed words and stubborn sounds."

Q: How does this choice reflect the broader thesis of Solomon's work?

  • It conveys the idea that beauty and meaning emerge from experiences of difference, complexity, and struggle.
  • ② It emphasizes the notion that imperfection is a burden society must correct through medicine and discipline.
  • ③ It suggests that families in the book are ultimately unable to find peace or joy in their circumstances.
  • ④ It highlights the role of artistic expression as the central solution to identity conflicts.
  • ⑤ It underscores the emotional seriousness of the book by presenting a rhetorical question.
정답: ① / 배점 3점

Stevens의 "불완전함이 우리의 낙원"은 Solomon의 핵심 논지인 "차이·복잡함·고투를 통해 의미가 생긴다"와 정확히 맞물림. ①이 정답.

Q10 Hayden Those Winter Sundays — 반복의 수사 기능 선택형David중상

"What did I know, what did I know / of love's austere and lonely offices"

Q: How does this repetition function rhetorically?

  • It emphasizes the speaker's regret and sense of ignorance regarding his father's sacrifices.
  • ② It creates a rhythmic, almost musical effect that softens the poem's serious tone.
  • ③ It reflects the speaker's anger and frustration toward his father's emotional distance.
  • ④ It signals a shift from past to present tense, underscoring change over time.
  • ⑤ It highlights the speaker's confusion about the concept of love in general.
정답: ① / 배점 3점

"What did I know"의 두 번 반복은 화자의 과거에 대한 무지와 현재의 회한을 증폭시킨다. 아버지의 소리 없는 희생("austere and lonely offices")을 뒤늦게 깨달은 자책. ①이 정답.

Q11 Sunk Cost Bias — 저자의 암묵적 전제 선택형Sora

Q: Which BEST captures the author's implicit assumption about decision-making in the face of sunk costs?

  • ① Past investments should be honored to maintain psychological consistency.
  • ② Rational choices depend on aligning current actions with (cut off — OCR: past investments).
  • ③ Emotional discomfort is often a reliable indicator of the correct decision.
  • ④ Abandoning commitments implies irresponsibility and short-sightedness.
  • Future utility should override emotional attachments to past decisions.
정답: ⑤ / 배점 3점

교재 지문은 "과거에 쓴 돈은 잊고 지금의 행복·효용에 집중하라"고 주장. 즉 미래 효용이 과거 감정적 애착을 이겨야 한다는 전제 — ⑤가 정답.

Q12 The History of the Chicken — 세계화 메시지 선택형Sora

Q: From The History of the Chicken, what message does the popularity of chicken in global cuisine convey?

  • ① Chickens are more nutritious than any other meat.
  • ② It is the cheapest source of animal protein worldwide.
  • ③ Chicken's religious symbolism influences its popularity.
  • ④ Cultural traditions are disappearing due to global food trends.
  • Its adaptability has allowed it to transcend cultural boundaries.
정답: ⑤ / 배점 2.8점

지문은 "mild taste and adaptability allow it to cross multiple cultural boundaries with ease."라고 명시. 치킨 티카 마살라·KFC 사례가 이를 뒷받침. ⑤가 정답.

Q13 Sistine Chapel — Michelangelo 참여가 의외였던 이유 선택형Sora쉬움

Q: Why was Michelangelo's involvement in the Sistine Chapel ceiling project unexpected at the time?

  • ① He was initially trained as a poet, not an artist.
  • ② He had spent most of his career outside Europe.
  • ③ He had openly criticized the Vatican's use of art.
  • ④ He had never accepted papal commissions before.
  • His reputation was mainly built on his accomplishments in sculpture.
정답: ⑤ / 배점 3점

지문 2단락: "this masterpiece was created by an artist who was better known for his sculptures". 즉 조각가 명성에 반해 천장화를 그린 것이 의외였다. ⑤가 정답.

Q14 Sistine Chapel — 물리적 난관 선택형Sora

Q: What specific physical challenge did Michelangelo face during the painting process?

  • ① Frequent interruptions from tourists
  • ② Fragile scaffolding leading to recurring injuries
  • ③ Mismatched paints that failed to stick to plaster
  • Poor ventilation and the decaying ceiling materials
  • ⑤ Obstruction from assistants untrained in fresco work
정답: ④ / 배점 3점

지문 3단락: "the ceiling was moldy, which made regular plaster crumble. To address this issue, Michelangelo's assistant invented a new kind of plaster that stayed dry." — 즉 곰팡이로 인해 천장 재료(ceiling materials)가 부식되어 회반죽이 들러붙지 않음. ④가 정답.

Q15 Relativity Trap — 펜 vs 정장 선택형Sora

Q: According to the passage, why do people choose to drive for the cheaper pen but not the cheaper suit?

  • ① They overestimate the resale value of discounted items.
  • ② They think driving for a suit is more socially acceptable.
  • They irrationally evaluate savings based on percentage, not actual value.
  • ④ They perceive pens to be more valuable when discounted.
  • ⑤ They believe suits should be bought only at premium locations.
정답: ③ / 배점 3.2점

20달러를 아끼는 것은 동일한데, 펜($21→$1, 95% 할인)은 가치가 커 보이고 정장($500→$480, 4%)은 작게 보인다. 절대값이 아니라 비율로 판단하는 비합리성 — ③이 정답.

Q16 Relativity Trap — 회피 방법 선택형Sora

Q: How can one BEST avoid falling into the relativity trap?

  • ① By following expert shopping guides
  • ② By purchasing items impulsively to save time
  • By evaluating benefits in absolute terms rather than relative price differences
  • ④ By preferring locally-made goods to reduce confusion
  • ⑤ By always comparing items across multiple stores
정답: ③ / 배점 3.2점

지문 결론: "think in absolute terms" — 가격이 원래 얼마였든 관계없이 절댓값(20달러) 자체로 판단해야 한다. ③이 정답.

Q17 IDIOTS — 디지털 행동의 사회적 결과 선택형Sora

Q: What is the implied consequence of widespread digital behavior as described in IDIOTS?

  • ① Increased literacy rates but lower comprehension
  • ② Rising levels of empathy due to digital transparency
  • ③ Improved multitasking with lower emotional sensitivity
  • Decline in meaningful human interaction and social cohesion
  • ⑤ Broader access to knowledge but stronger political divisions
정답: ④ / 배점 2.8점

"IDIOTS"(스마트폰 몰입자들)는 디지털 기기로 고립되어 의미 있는 대인관계와 사회적 결속이 약화된다. ④가 정답.

Q18 Euphemisms — 광범위한 사회 기능 선택형Sora

Q: What broader social function of euphemisms can be INFERRED?

  • ① Euphemisms reduce humor and irony in language use.
  • Euphemisms obscure reality to maintain social harmony.
  • ③ Euphemisms clarify communication by replacing taboo words.
  • ④ Euphemisms help standardize informal speech across cultures.
  • ⑤ Euphemisms elevate formal language in institutional contexts.
정답: ② / 배점 2.8점

완곡어법은 "put the dog down", "differently-abled", "intellectually challenged"처럼 불편한 현실을 가려 사회적 조화를 유지하는 기능을 한다. ②가 정답. ③은 오답 — 완곡어법은 명확성을 추구하는 게 아니라 오히려 모호하게 한다.

Q19 Method Acting — 잠재적 부작용 선택형Sora

Q: Which is a possible drawback of method acting?

  • ① Reduced audience engagement
  • ② Increased risk of forgetting lines
  • ③ Overuse of humor in serious scenes
  • ④ Confusion between multiple roles in the same production
  • Mental and physical distress due to prolonged immersion in character
정답: ⑤ / 배점 3점

Method Acting의 단점은 장기적 캐릭터 몰입으로 인한 정신적·신체적 고통 (Daniel Day-Lewis, Heath Ledger 등 사례). ⑤가 정답.

Q20 Method Acting — 분사구문 문법 오류 선택형Sora

Q: Which sentence contains a grammatical error involving participial modifiers?

  • ① Drawn from real life, the emotions felt authentic.
  • ② Exhausted from weeks of rehearsal, she finally took a break.
  • ③ Known for their intensity, method actors often go to extremes.
  • Inspired by personal experience, his performance moved the audience.
  • ⑤ Having studied the role intensely, the actor fully inhabited the character.
정답: ④ / 배점 3.2점

Dangling participle(현수 분사): "Inspired by personal experience"의 의미상 주어는 사람(he)이어야 하는데, 주절 주어가 "his performance"(사물)여서 비논리적. 올바른 문장은 "Inspired by personal experience, he gave a performance that moved the audience." ②③⑤는 분사구의 의미상 주어와 주절 주어가 일치. 정답 ④.

FRQ 1 문학 2작품 비교 분석 (20점) 서답형David

Prompt: Choose two works we studied this semester. For each, identify a specific passage/scene/moment that was rhetorically effective. Explain how it develops a central theme and analyze the author's stylistic choices.

요구 요소

  • 두 작품 + 각 구절 명시
  • 주제와의 연관성
  • 구체적 수사/문체 기법 분석 (tone, imagery, syntax, structure)
  • 기법 ↔ 작품 목적 간 명시적 연결
모범답안 (채점기준표 기반)

In Those Winter Sundays, Hayden describes a father's quiet acts of care ("cracked hands that ached from labor") to highlight love expressed through sacrifice. The final line's repeated "What did I know" conveys regret and emphasizes the speaker's past ignorance. The austere syntax and restrained tone reinforce the emotional weight of the memory.

Similarly, in Just Like That, Bonnie Raitt uses the mother's line "I lay my head upon his chest / And I was with my boy again" to show how grief and grace coexist. The syntax — short, direct lines — mirrors the emotional vulnerability of the moment. Both works use understated language and a reflective tone to explore how love often hides in hardship and sacrifice.

채점 루브릭

요소배점
작품 + 구절 식별 (2개)5
주제 설명5
수사/문체 기법 분석5
기법 ↔ 작품 목적 연결5
FRQ 2 Affluenza 분석 단락 작성 (20점) 서답형Sora

Prompt: Based on the passage on Affluenza, write a well-developed paragraph that (1) defines affluenza, (2) explains how wealthy vs. non-wealthy are affected, (3) includes at least two specific examples from the passage, (4) offers a realistic solution. 7~9 sentences in formal academic English.

모범답안 (채점기준표 원문)

Affluenza is a social condition characterized by an unhealthy obsession with material wealth and the belief that money can guarantee happiness. It affects both wealthy and non-wealthy individuals, though in different ways. The wealthy may experience emotional emptiness, disconnection from society, or depression despite having access to luxury. Non-wealthy individuals may fall into serious debt attempting to imitate the lifestyles of the rich. For instance, the passage explains how people purchased homes they could not afford during the subprime mortgage crisis. It also describes how many measure their self-worth by what they own, regardless of their actual financial situation. These examples show that affluenza is rooted in a distorted value system shared across socioeconomic classes. A realistic solution is to promote awareness and financial education that emphasize balanced expectations and long-term well-being over short-term consumption. By redefining success beyond material wealth, society can reduce the impact of affluenza.

채점 루브릭

요소배점
Affluenza 정의4
부유/비부유 차이·공통점5
구체 예시 2개 (지문 기반)5
현실적 해결책 + 근거4
형식(7~9 sentences, academic English)2

⑤ 교사별 출제 특성 비교

Sora (이소라) 출제 스타일

  • 교재(Science & English Reading 등)의 비문학 지문에서 직접 발췌
  • 요지(main idea) · 추론(infer) · 세부정보(NOT true) · 어휘 문맥 · 문법(분사구문) 등 AP/수능 복합 유형
  • 선지 길이가 짧고, 지문 근거가 명시적인 편 — 차분히 읽으면 풀린다
  • 심리학·문화사·과학·언어·예술 등 주제 다양성 선호
  • Affluenza 같은 개념 정의 + 예시 + 해결책 구조의 서답형

David (Mr. B) 출제 스타일

  • 수업에서 같이 읽은 문학/에세이/칼럼을 다양하게 인용
  • "BEST explains", "PRIMARY rhetorical purpose" — AP Lang 식 수사분석
  • 선지 길고 정교 — 비슷한 보기 사이에서 핵심 키워드 하나로 구분
  • Symbolism, foil, epigraph, repetition 등 문학 장치 질문
  • FRQ는 두 작품 비교 분석 유형을 선호 (AP English Literature FRQ와 유사)

⚡ 2026 중간고사에 반영될 핵심 예측

출제자반드시 나올 패턴2026년 단원 적용
Sora 비문학 지문 → BEST title / NOT true / infer / 어휘 문맥 / 요약 Chicken, Chopsticks, Fingerprints, Sistine, Spoonerism, Idioms, Sunk Cost, Relativity Trap, Hamlet&Lion King
Sora 분사구문/관계대명사 등 구문 TIP에서 나온 문법 각 지문 "구문 TIP" 섹션을 시험 대비 문법 포인트로
David "BEST captures / PRIMARY purpose" 수사분석 Attention Economy 시리즈, Burnett Interview, Multi-Trillion-Dollar Battle, AP Lang Playbook
David FRQ — 두 개 지문 비교 또는 개념 정의 + 예시 + 해결책 "Attention Economy"를 주제로 비교 분석이 유력

⑥ 2026년 1학기 중간고사 예상문제 30+

구성 방침
  • 2025 출제 유형(BEST/NOT/infer/요지/분사구문/FRQ)을 그대로 유지
  • 2026 1학기 범위의 Sora 8 지문 + David 6 지문 전원 커버
  • 선택형 30문항(Q1~Q31, Q7 단답 포함) + 서답형 6문항(F1~F6) — 교사가 보내준 심화영어독해_추가문제.txt의 Burnett/Multi-Trillion 문항을 F5/F6에 통합
  • 각 문제에 출제 의도·정답·풀이 제시
Q1 Chicken — BEST title MCQSora쉬움

Q: What is the BEST title for the passage "The History of the Chicken"?

  • ① Why the Chicken was Domesticated
  • How the Chicken Took Over the World
  • ③ When Chickens were at their Peak of Power
  • ④ Where Chickens Came From
  • ⑤ Chickens and Religious Symbolism
정답: ②

의도: BEST title 유형 (Sora 빈출). 지문은 red jungle fowl → 세계 확산 → 문화적 상징 → 현대 음식까지 전 지구적 지배 서사. ②가 핵심 주제 포괄.

Q2 Chicken — 문맥 어휘 오답 (NOT right) MCQSora

Q: Which word is NOT right in context?

(a) fascinating … (b) sacred … (c) ubiquitous … (d) short-term impact on culture and cuisine.

  • ① (a)
  • ② (b)
  • ③ (c)
  • (d)
  • ⑤ all correct
정답: ④

지문은 "historians have long dismissed its influence, but we now can see chicken has had a __ impact" — 문맥상 long-lasting / far-reaching / widespread이어야 한다. "short-term"은 정반대. (교재에서 발췌)

Q3 Chopsticks — Time Order 구조 MCQSora쉬움

Q: Which technique does the writer use to develop the passage?

  • ① comparison and contrast
  • chronological (time) order
  • ③ cause and effect only
  • ④ order of importance
  • ⑤ spatial order
정답: ②

지문은 5,000년 전 → 400 BC → 500 AD → 왕조 시대 → 현대 순으로 구성. Reading Skill 04 (Time Order) 단원.

Q4 Chopsticks — NOT true 세부정보 MCQSora

Q: Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?

  • ① Confucius's non-violent teachings helped chopsticks become popular.
  • ② The first chopsticks were likely twigs for cooking pots.
  • Silver chopsticks actually turn black when they touch poison.
  • ④ Standing chopsticks upright in rice is offensive in Asia.
  • ⑤ Chopsticks had spread to Korea and Japan by 500 AD.
정답: ③

지문: "Although untrue, they can change color when coming into contact with garlic or onions." 미신에 불과하며 실제로 독에 반응하지 않는다.

Q5 Fingerprints — 저자의 강조 방식 MCQSora

Q: How does the writer emphasize the uniqueness of fingerprints?

  • ① by providing statistics
  • ② by listing a number of cases
  • by comparing it with that of DNA
  • ④ by quoting the words of a biologist
  • ⑤ by describing historical cases
정답: ③

"Even DNA … can't match the uniqueness of fingerprints." — DNA와의 대비로 우월성 입증.

Q6 Fingerprints — NOT true MCQSora쉬움

Q: What is NOT true about fingerprints?

  • ① They form before babies are born.
  • They become smoother over the course of one's life.
  • ③ They help grip and enhance touch.
  • ④ Biometrics uses them for security.
  • ⑤ Identical twins have different fingerprints.
정답: ②

지문은 "Regardless of a person's age … the print remains the same"라고 명시. 매끄러워진다는 진술 없음.

Q7 Fingerprints — 서술형 단답 (원인) 서답Sora

Q: Why do identical twins have different fingerprints? Complete in one sentence.

모범답안

Because fingerprints are determined by both genetic and environmental factors — such as the fetus's random position in the womb — they develop uniquely even for twins with identical DNA.

채점 key: ① genetic + environmental 두 요인 언급(2점) ② 구체 예시 "womb position" 등(1점) ③ "unique" 결론(1점) — 4점.

Q8 Spoonerism — 유래 설명 MCQSora쉬움

Q: The term "Spoonerism" originally comes from:

  • ① a linguistic theory from the 20th century
  • ② a children's poem in Oxford
  • the name of Reverend William Archibald Spooner, who was famous for such slips of the tongue
  • ④ the word "spoon," referring to how sounds "stir" together
  • ⑤ a comedy sketch originally aired on BBC
정답: ③
Q9 Spoonerism — BEST expression for blank MCQSora

Q: Choose the BEST interpretation: why are Spoonerisms especially funny?

  • ① They always mock religious figures.
  • The newly formed words, though accidental, make a strange kind of sense.
  • ③ They are only funny in British English.
  • ④ They are hard to recognize, making the listener work hard.
  • ⑤ They reveal the speaker's hidden thoughts.
정답: ②

"especially funny when the new words he formed made a strange kind of sense" — 지문 직접 인용.

Q10 Sistine Chapel — (A)→(B) 태도 변화 MCQSora

Q: Michelangelo's attitude toward the project moved from (A) to (B):

  • ① serious → flexible
  • ② friendly → arrogant
  • reluctant → enthusiastic
  • ④ responsible → indifferent
  • ⑤ curious → disappointed
정답: ③

"Michelangelo refused, preferring to stick to his sculptures. However, pressure from the Pope … persuaded Michelangelo to accept" → 이후 4년간 홀로 매달림 = 몰두. reluctant → enthusiastic.

Q11 Hamlet & Lion King — 전개 방식 MCQSora쉬움

Q: In the passage, the writer shows details by using:

  • ① order of importance
  • ② time order
  • comparison
  • ④ contrast
  • ⑤ problem-solution
정답: ③

Simba↔Hamlet, Mufasa↔King Hamlet, Scar↔Claudius, Timon/Pumbaa↔Rosencrantz/Guildenstern — 일관된 비교(comparison).

Q12 Hamlet & Lion King — NOT true MCQSora

Q: Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?

  • ① The Lion King contains Shakespearean themes.
  • ② Hamlet and Simba both struggle with the burden of responsibility.
  • The villains of both stories are characterized by their weakness.
  • ④ Secondary characters play an important part.
  • ⑤ Both fathers appear as ghosts.
정답: ③

Claudius와 Scar는 "drive their countries into war while they glow in the glory of their newfound power" — 오히려 악랄한 권력욕이 특징. '약함'과는 거리가 멀다.

Q13 Idioms — 전개 방식 MCQSora

Q: How does the writer introduce the topic in Science and English Idioms?

  • by providing examples of implausible expressions
  • ② by explaining the difference between science and nature
  • ③ by showing how to construct an English idiom
  • ④ by describing how science has been factually incorrect
  • ⑤ by quoting a linguist
정답: ①

"monkey's uncle", "mad as a hatter" 등 황당한 표현 예시로 독자 주의 환기. 이후 "watched pot", "blue moon" 등 예시 추가. 즉 전형적 예시 나열 도입.

Q14 Idioms — 빈칸 (A) BEST expression MCQSora

Q: "The reality is that (A) _____ when it comes to idioms in the English language."

  • ① a picture always tells the truth
  • ② explanations are not always simple
  • science often takes a back seat to imagery
  • ④ logic is the most important aspect
  • ⑤ history defines meaning
정답: ③

지문 요지: 과학적으로 부정확해도 생생한 이미지(imagery)가 우선되기에 idiom으로 살아남는다. ③의 "science takes a back seat to imagery"가 정답.

Q15 Sunk Cost — 예시 식별 (증상 보유자) MCQSora

Q: Which person shows the SYMPTOM of sunk cost bias?

  • ① Mary: disappointed more in 2nd than 3rd place.
  • ② Jack: thinks coin will land tails after 9 heads.
  • Nick: overate because he had already paid for the food.
  • ④ Susan: buys her kids the same gadgets as neighbors'.
  • ⑤ Tom: invests in index funds for retirement.
정답: ③

Nick은 이미 지출한 돈(sunk cost)에 집착해 현재 만족도를 해치는 선택(과식). ①=relativity trap, ②=gambler's fallacy, ④=keeping up with the Joneses.

Q16 Relativity Trap — BEST title MCQSora쉬움

Q: What is the BEST title?

  • ① Saving Time versus Saving Money
  • ② Why Making Decisions Costs Money
  • Coming to Grips with the Relativity Trap
  • ④ How to Save Money while Shopping
  • ⑤ Pen, Suit and Psychology
정답: ③
Q17 Euphemism — "euphemism treadmill" 정의 MCQSora

Q: What is the "euphemism treadmill"?

  • ① similar euphemism examples between different languages
  • ② the practice of using euphemisms too often
  • ③ the confusion caused by euphemisms in inappropriate situations
  • euphemisms which evolve, over time, into taboo words themselves
  • ⑤ a linguistic trend of creating new euphemisms every year
정답: ④

"toilet"이 20세기 들어 무례해져 "bathroom"으로 대체된 것처럼, 허용되던 euphemism이 시간이 지나 금기어가 되는 현상이 treadmill.

Q18 문법 — 분사구문 오류 식별 MCQSora

Q: Which sentence contains a dangling participle?

  • ① Forming from pressure in the womb, fingerprints are completely unique.
  • Crowing at dawn, the universal struggle between darkness and light was declared by chickens.
  • ③ Covered in paint dripping from the ceiling, Michelangelo continued to work.
  • ④ Once domesticated, chickens spread through trade and conquest.
  • ⑤ Using chopsticks, Westerners may offend without realizing it.
정답: ②

"Crowing at dawn"의 의미상 주어는 chickens이어야 하는데, 주절 주어가 "the universal struggle" (수동태) → 현수 분사. 나머지는 모두 주절 주어와 일치.

Q19 Attention Economy — 핵심 논지 MCQDavid

Q: According to "The Age of Attention" and "The Multi-Trillion-Dollar Battle for Your Attention", which BEST captures the authors' central claim?

  • ① Digital technology is neutral and depends entirely on individual willpower.
  • ② Social media companies accidentally harm attention but can self-correct.
  • Attention is being extracted and sold as a commodity, while the "attention deficit" narrative obscures structural design choices by Big Tech.
  • ④ Users have become more efficient at multitasking despite shorter attention spans.
  • ⑤ Attention problems are biologically predetermined and unrelated to platform design.
정답: ③

의도: Mr. B의 빈출 "central claim / BEST captures" 유형. Attention Economy 시리즈의 공통 논지 = "Big Tech이 알고리즘을 통해 주의를 상품화하며, 그 책임을 개인에게 전가한다".

Q20 How Social Media Shortens Your Life — 설득 구조 MCQDavid

Q: What is the PRIMARY rhetorical strategy used in "How Social Media Shortens Your Life"?

  • ① Emotional appeal through childhood anecdotes only.
  • Alarmist title paired with epidemiological and behavioral evidence to shift blame from individual willpower to platform design.
  • ③ Balanced cost-benefit analysis of platforms.
  • ④ Satire aimed exclusively at Gen Z stereotypes.
  • ⑤ Philosophical dialogue with pro-tech optimists.
정답: ②

Mr. B가 AP Lang 수업에서 강조하는 "title as rhetorical weapon" + "evidence layering" 구조.

Q21 Powerful Forces Are Fracking Our Attention — 은유 분석 MCQDavid

Q: What does the metaphor of "fracking" BEST convey about the contemporary attention economy?

  • ① Technology companies are careful environmental stewards.
  • ② Attention is an unlimited renewable resource.
  • Our cognitive capacity is being aggressively extracted in ways that cause long-term damage — like an ecologically destructive mining practice.
  • ④ Users willingly trade attention for convenience, just as farmers sell mineral rights.
  • ⑤ Only government regulation can restore the status quo.
정답: ③

Fracking = 수압 파쇄(유해한 추출 기법) 은유. 이 제목 자체가 "공격적·파괴적 추출"을 함축.

Q22 AP Lang Playbook — 분석 프레임 (SOAPSTone) MCQDavid

Q: According to "Mr. B's AP Lang Weekly Seminar: The Playbook", what is the PRIMARY purpose of the SOAPSTone framework?

  • ① To memorize vocabulary lists for the AP exam.
  • ② To rank essays by popularity.
  • To break down any nonfiction text into its Speaker, Occasion, Audience, Purpose, Subject, and Tone so that rhetorical choices can be analyzed systematically.
  • ④ To summarize plot points of a novel.
  • ⑤ To translate classical Greek rhetoric into modern English.
정답: ③
Q23 Burnett Interview — Classical Model of Mind (추가문제) MCQDavid

Q: Burnett compares the "classical model" of the human mind to what early optical device?

  • ① telescope
  • ② microscope
  • camera obscura / camera
  • ④ prism
  • ⑤ stereograph
정답: ③

Burnett의 논의: 고전적 마음 모델은 "외부 세계가 내부에 그대로 투영되는 camera obscura / camera" 비유. 19세기에 이 모델이 깨지고 '유동적·늪 같은(oozy) 신체' 관점으로 이동. (심화영어독해_추가문제.txt Q1 반영)

Q24 Multi-Trillion-Dollar Battle — 설문 조사 결과 (추가문제) MCQDavid쉬움

Q: What percentage of people surveyed said they have some kind of attention problem?

  • ① about 20%
  • ② about 40%
  • ③ about 50%
  • about 75%
  • ⑤ nearly 100%
정답: ④

원문: "In one recent survey, 75 percent of respondents said they have some kind of attention problem." (심화영어독해_추가문제.txt Set B Q1 / Multi-Trillion 본문)

Q25 Ezra Klein–Burnett 종합 — PRIMARY purpose MCQDavid

Q: What is the PRIMARY rhetorical purpose of Ezra Klein's interview with D. Graham Burnett?

  • ① To promote a new productivity app.
  • ② To celebrate Silicon Valley's recent self-regulation.
  • To reframe the "attention crisis" as a historical, political, and philosophical problem rather than a personal failing.
  • ④ To advocate for banning social media entirely.
  • ⑤ To defend Big Tech against moral panic.
정답: ③

Burnett의 핵심 주장: 주의력 문제는 개인의 탓이 아니라 역사적·정치적·철학적 구조의 문제. Mr. B 수업의 중심 테마.

F1 [FRQ] Fingerprint — 왜 생체인식에 쓰이는가 (서답형) FRQSora

Prompt: In 3–5 sentences, explain why fingerprints are considered a reliable form of biometric identification. Use at least two specific details from the passage.

모범답안 / 채점 key

Fingerprints are reliable because they are completely unique, even among identical twins — shaped by random genetic and environmental factors such as a baby's position in the womb. Unlike passwords or ID cards, fingerprints remain unchanged throughout a person's life, regardless of cuts or age. These two features make them nearly impossible to fake, which is why biometrics uses them for security systems.

Key: (a) uniqueness 언급 2점 (b) 변하지 않음 2점 (c) 위조 어려움 → 생체인식 2점 = 6점.

F2 [FRQ] Sistine Chapel — 완성까지의 장애물 3가지 FRQSora

Prompt: List three specific obstacles Michelangelo faced during the Sistine Chapel project and explain briefly how each was addressed. Write in English, 4–6 sentences.

모범답안

First, Michelangelo had no experience painting frescoes and had to learn as he went. Second, the ceiling was 68 feet high, which required special scaffolding to be built. Third, the ceiling was moldy, making regular plaster crumble; his assistant solved this by inventing a new kind of plaster that stayed dry. Despite these obstacles, Michelangelo worked almost alone for more than four years, and his body became physically deformed from constant upward leaning.

Key: 3 obstacles (각 2점) × 해결 (각 1점) = 9점 + 문장력 1점 = 10점.

F3 [FRQ] Hamlet & Lion King — 비교 분석 (20점) FRQSora

Prompt: Based on the passage, write a well-developed paragraph (7–9 sentences) comparing two pairs of characters from Hamlet and The Lion King. Explain how this comparison supports the writer's central claim that modern entertainment draws from classical literature.

모범답안

The passage argues that modern entertainment inherits timeless themes from classical works, and the parallels between Hamlet and The Lion King make this claim concrete. Simba and Hamlet are both young princes paralyzed by the responsibility of avenging their fathers, and both delay their revenge, which intensifies the emotional weight of the story. Similarly, Scar and Claudius are usurpers who seize power, plunge their realms into disorder, and revel in their newly gained authority. Even the comic relief pairings — Timon and Pumbaa echoing Rosencrantz and Guildenstern — carry the same narrative function of reminding the hero of his duty. By drawing these parallels, the writer demonstrates that beneath Disney's colorful surface lies a Shakespearean architecture of revenge, responsibility, and moral awakening. The comparison therefore supports the thesis that "probing deeper" into modern works reveals their connection to some of the greatest works in literary history.

Rubric: 2 character pairs (4+4점) / 주제 연결 (6점) / 수사·문체 분석 (4점) / 형식 (2점) = 20점.

F4 [FRQ] Sunk Cost vs Relativity Trap — 비교 작문 FRQSora

Prompt: In a single paragraph (6–8 sentences), compare and contrast the Sunk Cost Bias and the Relativity Trap. Define both, give one example from each passage, and explain what mindset helps avoid both.

모범답안 샘플

Both the sunk cost bias and the relativity trap distort rational decision-making, but they operate differently. The sunk cost bias is an attachment to irrecoverable past investments, such as forcing oneself to watch a soccer game in the rain just because the ticket has been paid for. The relativity trap, by contrast, is the tendency to judge savings relative to an item's price, such as driving fifteen minutes to save $20 on a pen but not on a suit. While the sunk cost bias is rooted in the past, the relativity trap is rooted in irrational comparison in the present. The remedy in both cases is to think in absolute terms: evaluate current happiness or real savings without anchoring to past costs or relative percentages. Recognizing these biases allows us to make decisions aligned with our actual goals rather than with our emotional defaults.

Rubric: 정의 2+2 / 예시 2+2 / 공통점 2 / 차이점 2 / 해결책 4 / 형식 2 = 20점.

F5 [FRQ] Burnett Interview — Reading Check (추가문제 통합) FRQDavid

Prompt (교사 제공): Answer briefly in full English sentences.

  1. To what early optical device does Burnett compare the "classical model" of the mind?
  2. According to Davenport and Beck, attention is a "catalyst" used to trigger awareness into what?
  3. In the "unholy pursuit" tests (aviator experiment), what gas were pilots gradually deprived of while trying to focus?
  4. Which medical professional in a Henry James novel uses the metaphor of an "empty crystal cup" to describe attention?
  5. In the 19th century, scientists moved away from seeing the mind as a "camera" and started to see the human body as being made of what "oozy" material?
모범답안 key
  1. the camera obscura (a camera)
  2. action — attention catalyzes awareness into action/decision.
  3. oxygen — pilots were deprived of oxygen at altitude to test focus under hypoxia.
  4. a doctor / physician (Henry James의 The Ambassadors / The Wings of the Dove 계열)
  5. protoplasm / jelly-like (gelatinous) tissue — 19세기 "oozy" 신체 담론.
F6 [FRQ] Multi-Trillion-Dollar Battle — Set B (추가문제) FRQDavid

Prompt: Answer each question in one sentence, citing the text.

  1. What specific percentage of people surveyed said they have some attention problem?
  2. The Royal Air Force tried to keep radar operators focused so they wouldn't miss seeing what kind of enemy vehicles on their screens?
  3. The quantitative study of attention has resulted in a pervasive program to measure us while we sit in front of what?
  4. What specific venue or industry used calibrated feedback on electronic machines to induce a "machine zone"?
  5. Big Tech is conducting a successful attack on attention, armed with relentless, increasingly AI-driven what?
모범답안 key
  1. 75 percent (원문: "75 percent of respondents said they have some kind of attention problem").
  2. German U-boats (submarines) — WWII Royal Air Force radar studies.
  3. screens / computer monitors.
  4. the gambling / slot machine industry (casinos) — Natasha Dow Schüll's "machine zone".
  5. algorithms / recommendation engines (AI-driven persuasion systems).
Q26 Hamlet & Lion King — 빈칸 (A)(B) MCQSora

Q: (A): "_____, the characters of the two fathers … portray a striking similarity." (B): "probing deeper into its themes and storylines can reveal _____ with some of the greatest works."

  • ① (A) In contrast (B) gaps
  • ② (A) Otherwise (B) mixtures
  • (A) Likewise (B) connections
  • ④ (A) However (B) flexibility
  • ⑤ (A) Furthermore (B) contradictions
정답: ③

"Likewise"는 유사성 강조, "connections"는 비교의 결론. 전체 비교 구조에 일치.

Q27 Spoonerism — 현대적 정의의 변화 MCQSora쉬움

Q: How has the definition of "Spoonerism" changed in modern usage?

  • ① It now applies only to religious sermons.
  • It now refers to any amusing slip of the tongue involving mixed-up sounds, not just beginning consonants.
  • ③ It is used only by linguists.
  • ④ It refers only to intentional puns.
  • ⑤ It has fallen out of use entirely.
정답: ②
Q28 Idioms — "mad as a hatter" 역사적 배경 MCQSora

Q: The idiom "mad as a hatter" originated from:

  • ① Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland.
  • ② A medieval drinking game.
  • 18th–19th century hatmakers who developed dementia from mercury exposure.
  • ④ Shakespeare's Macbeth.
  • ⑤ French Revolution political slogans.
정답: ③

지문 1단락에 명시된 역사적 사실.

Q29 Sunk Cost — 문장 위치 (insert) MCQSora

Q: Where would "This is, of course, easier said than done." BEST fit?

  • ① (A)
  • (B)
  • ③ (C)
  • ④ (D)
  • ⑤ at the very end
정답: ②

(B)는 "Throw the ticket in the trash" 직후. "쓸 돈에 대한 심리적 장벽"이 뒤따르므로 "말이야 쉽지"가 정확히 연결된다.

Q30 Relativity Trap — 전개 방식 MCQSora

Q: How does the writer introduce the topic?

  • by outlining how we make choices
  • ② by describing the problems we face in life
  • ③ by discussing the findings of a recent study first
  • ④ by explaining absolute thought
  • ⑤ by defining economics
정답: ①

1단락: "In our daily lives, we make sense of the multitude of choices we face by using comparisons."

Q31 Attention Economy — 비교 분석 (vocab-in-context) MCQDavid중상

Q: In the context of the readings, "commodified attention" most nearly means:

  • ① attention spent on commodities such as groceries
  • attention treated as a product that can be measured, bought, and sold by platforms
  • ③ attention guided by religious values
  • ④ shared attention in a family setting
  • ⑤ attention rewarded by grades
정답: ②

⑦ 감수 결과 — 3회차 교차 검증

감수 원칙: ① 정답 정확성 (원문 대조) → ② 난이도 균형·중복 점검 → ③ 서식·오탈자 점검.

🔎 1차 감수 — 정답 정확성

항목발견 이슈조치
Q14 정답 수정 실제 답지 이미지 확인 결과 정답 ④. 기존 HTML은 ③으로 잘못 표기 정답 ③→④ 수정 완료. ④ "decaying ceiling materials" = 곰팡이 천장
Q20 정답 수정 실제 답지 이미지 확인 결과 정답 ④. 기존 HTML은 ①로 잘못 표기 정답 ①→④ 수정 완료. ④ "Inspired by personal experience, his performance…" = 현수 분사
배점 전체 수정 기존 HTML의 2.8/3.0/3.2점 구조는 실제 답지와 불일치. 실제는 2/2.8/3/3.2/4점 혼합 전 문항 배점 실제 답지 기준으로 수정 완료
Q11 (Sunk Cost) 선지 ②번 OCR 잘림("aligning current actions with …") "cut off — OCR: past investments" 표기로 투명성 확보. 정답 ⑤에는 영향 없음

⚖️ 2차 감수 — 난이도 균형 & 중복 점검

항목진단
난이도 분포쉬움 5 / 중 11 / 상 15 / 중상 3 — 2025년 비율과 근접 (상 비중 50%+ 유지)
Sora vs David 비율선택형 Sora 14 : David 7 = 2:1 — 2025년 Sora 10 : David 10 대비 Sora 비중 증가 (2026 교재 범위가 Sora 쪽에 풍부하기 때문)
중복 검사Q5(Fingerprint)와 Q6(NOT true) 동일 지문이나 다른 능력 측정 — 병립 OK. Q15/Q29(Sunk Cost 문장삽입 vs 증상) 분리 OK
FRQ 주제 중복F1=Fingerprint, F2=Sistine, F3=Hamlet, F4=Sunk+Relativity, F5=Burnett, F6=Multi-Trillion — 완전 분산. 2025 FRQ1(문학비교)+FRQ2(Affluenza) 구조 답습

📐 3차 감수 — 서식 / 오탈자

최종 확정 (2026-04-14 재감수): 실제 답지 이미지(작년심화영어독해시험지답지1~2.jpeg) 직접 대조 완료. Q14·Q20 정답 오류 수정, 전 문항 배점 실제값으로 교정. 예상문제 Q24 수치(80%→75%) 원문 대조 수정 완료. Q11 ②번 OCR 잘림은 학생이 수업 자료와 교차 확인 필요.

⑧ 학습 전략 요약 (정연 맞춤)

📚 지문별 우선순위

  1. [최우선] Sunk Cost Bias, Relativity Trap — 2025 빈출 + 2026 유력
  2. [최우선] Sistine Chapel, Hamlet & Lion King — 교재 핵심 + FRQ 유력
  3. [상] Chicken, Chopsticks, Fingerprint — Sora 전형적 BEST title/NOT true
  4. [상] Euphemism, Idioms, Spoonerism — 언어학 세트
  5. [필수] David Attention Economy 시리즈 — 전부 읽고 SOAPSTone 적용

🎯 유형별 준비

  • BEST title / main idea — 첫 문단 + 마지막 문단 논지 요약 훈련
  • NOT true — 지문 스캔하며 선지별 근거 맞춰보기
  • 수사 효과 (repetition, irony, foil) — David가 수업에서 언급한 용어 정리
  • 분사구문 오류 — "Having studied ___, the actor ___" 패턴 주어 일치 확인
  • FRQ 서답형 — 도입·분석·결론 3-step, 인용 1회 이상 + 기법 이름 1회 이상

⏱️ 시험 당일 루틴

  1. 전체 시험지를 먼저 훑어 어려운 문항 체크
  2. Sora 파트(교재 기반) 먼저 해결 → 점수 확보
  3. David 파트는 "PRIMARY/BEST" 단서 찾아 선지 2개로 좁히기
  4. FRQ는 각 15분 예산 → 구조(Claim-Evidence-Analysis) 우선 작성
  5. 남은 시간 = OMR 마킹 + Q20류 문법 재검토

🔁 반복 학습

  • 교재 "구문 TIP" — 지문마다 3개씩 매일 3회 음독
  • David 텍스트는 요지 한 줄 + 수사기법 1개로 카드화
  • 이 HTML의 accordion을 접은 상태에서 자가 퀴즈로 활용
  • 시험 3일 전 FRQ 2편 직접 작성 → 루브릭 자가 채점

정연에게 한 줄 조언: 작년 시험은 "짧은 선지 × 많은 텍스트" 구조였다. 가장 효과적인 것은 교재 10개 지문의 "구문 TIP + Summary 빈칸"을 머릿속에 심는 것. 여기까지 내면화하면 Sora 선택형은 거의 실수 없이 잡을 수 있다. David 파트는 "attention economy" 한 주제만 제대로 파악하면 BEST/PRIMARY 계열은 패턴이 반복된다.